Federal Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams granted a joint motion on Thursday that pushes a federal trial naming a Centerville police officer and the city of Centerville to 2015.

Heather Huebner first filed the lawsuit against the city and police officer Ken Reistroffer in Jan. 2013. The original jury trial was set for July 10, 2014. That date was later moved to July 21 and has now been pushed to June 22, 2015.

The joint motion states the two parties have participated in four depositions in the matter already, with four additional key depositions set to take place. The most recent deposition date, March 27, was canceled due to a family death of one of the attorneys.

The court filings state the defendants — the city and police officer — have produced over 800 pages of documents and the plaintiff, Huebner, has produced 57 exhibits.

The joint filing says in order to complete the deposition process, and to allow the court time to consider the dispositive motions expected to be filed prior to the trial, more time was needed by all parties.

On Wednesday, Federal Judge John A. Jarvey granted the a motion by the defense in the case to dismiss charges that named the Centerville police officer’s wife, Sheila Reistroffer, as a co-conspirator. The dismissed count alleged Sheila acted with her husband Ken in intimidating Huebner after Huebner declined to allow her daughter to undergo the sexual assault evidence collection process.

The court order issued by Judge Jarvey stated while a complaint doesn’t require detailed factual allegations, it must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” The judge ruled that Sheila’s alleged acts would not create a plausible claim of conspiracy.

The lawsuit, now just over a year and two months old, alleges that officer Reistroffer maliciously filed a felony and aggravated misdemeanor charge against Huebner, after she declined to consent to a sexual assault evidence collection kit on her daughter, then 12 years old.

Reistroffer had alleged Huebner’s daughter had been the victim of “inappropriate sexual contact by a male juvenile.” Filings from the defendant say Reistroffer believed Huebner’s daughter required an evaluation and requested a sexual abuse kit be completed.

Federal court filings by Hubener claim that Huebner, her husband and a doctor deemed the test was not medically necessary after a brief physical examination indicated a sexual assault had not occurred.

On Feb. 17, 2011, Reistroffer charged Huebner with neglect or abandonment of a dependent person, a class C felony, and child endangerment, an aggravated misdemeanor. Both of those charges were dismissed by court order two months later.

Huebner is alleging those charges were brought against her in retaliation of not complying with Reistroffer’s request for a sexual abuse assault kit to be completed.

This Week's Circulars