Ad-Express and Daily Iowegian, Centerville, IA

Letters to the Editor

April 4, 2013

Cincinnati residents concerned with City Hall

CENTERVILLE — Dear Editor,

 

The Cincinnati city clerk has received a 45 percent raise in six months. The clerk was hired in September of 2012 at $12 an hour. The clerk was hired for up to a 25 hour work week. Within three months, the clerk has received a $2.50 raise (20 percent) to $14.50 per hour.

There was a specially called meeting on March 26, 2013, to discuss and approve the clerks raise. There was a motion by Councilman Waterman to pay the clerk $435 for a 30 hour week. this motion was second by Councilman Conger. There were comments by myself (Jeff Lenik), Jessica Lenik, Noreen Jarvis, John Jarvis, Margie Stewart and Pat Nelson to discuss Resolution 13-10. Mayor Rummans stated he would not allow discussions on this resolution at this meeting. He stated we would have time to discuss it at the April 8, 2013 meeting. With that said, the mayor and council voted to pass the Resolution unanimously! The clerks pay increase went into effect 3-31-2013, a full week before we would be able to discuss.

I have reviewed the agenda for the budget meeting scheduled for April 8. Resolution 13-10 is not on the agenda. The mayor and City Council have no intention of discussing this resolution. They hoped this pay raise would slip right under the radar of concerned citizens, just as the previous increases in the clerk's pay.  

How is this possible? How can the clerk start to receive a raise when residents of Cincinnati haven't even been able to discuss it? How is it possible that the city clerk can go from $12 paid hourly (part-time employee) to $435 a week paid salary (full-time employee). This a 45 percent raise in pay in six months.

The published proposed budget shows a $12,000 deficit. How is the city giving raises to new hired employees when the city doesn't have enough money to pay the city's bills?

Mayor Rummans stated the clerk has been working 60 hours a week to fix "the mess." To date, he has not defined "the mess." He stated that by increasing the clerk to a salary of 30 hours a week, the clerk would have to "eat" any hours the clerk worked after 30 hours.

That is a bunch of nonsense! I am sure federal labor laws does not support Mayor Rumman's comments. The clerk will be paid overtime for every hour worked past the 30 hours at the regular hourly rate, up to 40 hours, and then time and 1/2 after 40 hours. The mayor and clerk stated in the March 26 special meeting, that the clerk has been working 60-70 hours per week. The only one who benefits from this, is the clerk. If the clerk works less than 30 hours, the clerk will still receive her 30 hours. This liability will be put upon the city of Cincinnati, which means the concerned residents of Cincinnati.

It is irresponsible to increase city expenditures and not allow city residents to be part of the process. It shouldn't be much of a surprise, since these are the same city representatives who went against the advice of the city attorney and the City Ordinance and voted in favor of "exotic dancers" aka stripper night at the Cowboy bar, totally exposing the city of Cincinnati and its residents to any potential liability.

 

Sincerely

Jeff and Jessica Lenik

1
Text Only
Letters to the Editor
  • Black eye at the FBI To some observers, it might seem awfully tedious work, not worth the effort.Congressional oversight requires patience, resilience and earnestness. Tracking down answers, obtaining documents and interviewing whistleblowers typically are not met with a

    July 29, 2014

  • Catholic charities help illegal aliens During the 2012 presidential election, Republicans thought they found a sure path to victory. While it was obvious that long-coveted Hispanics weren’t going to budge, a different group (which an overwhelming majority of Hispanics belong) showed promi

    July 23, 2014

  • Solicitation ordinance? The Daily Iowegian will publish an editorial Question of the Week on the Opinion page.The Iowegian wants readers to think about the solicitation ordinance that will prevent groups or individuals from entering a roadway to solicit money. The Centervil

    July 23, 2014

  • Stinking U.S.-Mexican border politics Here’s a modest proposal for solving the “Children’s Invasion” on our southwestern borders.Next time a planeload of “unaccompanied alien children” from Honduras or Guatemala is being dispersed to their relatives in the U.S., the pilot should divert t

    July 23, 2014

  • Don't let Big Oil bully biofuels It’s vacation season across America. That means family road trips are underway and the traveling public is paying even closer attention when they pull up to the pump. Today’s drivers also value clean-burning fuel choices that help the environment and

    July 22, 2014

  • Lerner's illegal instant message trick It was so brazen. Right there, over email, Lois Lerner warned her colleagues “Congress has asked for emails ... so we need to be cautious about what we say in emails.” Then she asked whether the IRS’s instant messaging application was being archived,

    July 17, 2014

  • Going to visit the AC Fair? The Daily Iowegian will publish an editorial Question of the Week on the Opinion page.The Iowegian wants readers to think about the 2014 Appanoose County Fair. It starts Monday and wraps up on Saturday with a demolition derby at 8 p.m.So, the questio

    July 17, 2014

  • Compliance with open meetings law Editor’s Note: This is a monthly column prepared by the Iowa Public Information Board to update Iowans on the IPIB’s activities and provide information on some of the issues routinely addressed by the board.Iowa courts have not yet definitively answe

    July 14, 2014

  • Making time for others Dear Editor,We live in a time where we depend on modern conveniences to save us time. We enjoy the pleasures of having vehicles, computers, dishwashers, running water, electricity, fast food, washers and dryers while expecting these conveniences to f

    July 14, 2014

  • The right to a paid vacation Ah, summer is here. We all know what that means: The rights crowd will demand that our politicians pass new federal laws to make paid vacation mandatory.It is true that the United States is the only advanced economy that does not require employers to

    July 10, 2014

  • Vote for U.S. representative? The Daily Iowegian will publish an Editorial Question of the Week on the Opinion page.The Iowegian wants readers to think about the upcoming election in November. In the next few weeks and months we will ask our readers to pick a candidate in selecte

    July 10, 2014

  • A defensive response and the IRS Ring, ring.“Hello, this is Tom.”“Hello, Tom, this is the federal government. We are going to audit your taxes and want to see all of your records for 2011.”“Sorry, federal government, but my computer crashed in 2011. All of my emails, electronic rece

    June 25, 2014

  • Vote for A.C. Supervisor? The Daily Iowegian will publish an editorial Question of the Week on the Opinion page.The Iowegian wants readers to think about the upcoming election in November. In the next few weeks and months we will ask our readers to pick a candidate in selecte

    June 25, 2014

  • The hard lessons of Iraq Nearly 5,000 of our fine men and women died in Iraq.Who’s going to explain Iraq to their loved ones now?Who’s going to explain why, if it was so important that we had to go to Iraq in 2003, we just walked away?Iraq is back in our living rooms every n

    June 25, 2014

  • 'Safe Routes to School - Balderdash!' ‘Safe Routes to School —Balderdash!’Dear Editor,Safe Routes to School — Balderdash! There is no such thing. There is no such thing as unsafe routes to school either.This was all a ploy for one reason — money, and had absolutely nothing to do with the

    June 24, 2014

Obituaries
Featured Ads
Poll

The Iowegian wants readers to think about the solicitation ordinance that will prevent groups or individuals from entering a roadway to solicit money. The Centerville City Council in June by a 5-0 vote passed the first reading of just such an ordinance. Public pressure and during a subsequent special meeting, the council voted 3-2 to table the ordinance. A second special meeting to discuss the solicitation ordinance is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 7 at City Hall. So, the question of the week is, "Do you or do you not support the ordinance to prevent solicitation of funds in city streets?"

A. I support the ordinance
B. I do not support the ordinance
C. Not sure
     View Results
Iowegian on Facebook